中?文?摘?要
目的 ：评价从美国引进的儿童青少年创伤事件终身经历问卷和创伤后症状量表,
以判断其是否适宜在本土广泛推广应用。
方法 ：以整抽样方法抽取 8-18 岁广州市区普通中小学校学生以及市内两所特
殊学校学生 (聋人学校与工读学校) 为调查对象。量表经过翻译-回译程序,
以青少年行为自评量表( Achenbach?YSR-1991)为效标。采用评价指标有Cronbach?α系数、重测信度系数、内容效度、结构效度、判别效度、效标效度等。
中小学数学网结果：创伤事件终身经历问卷-学生版(LITE-S)Cronbach?α系数为0.794,5
周重测信度系数为 0.760；创伤后症状自评量表(CROPS)Cronbach?α系
数为 0.903,5 周重测信度系数 0.765。创伤事件终身经历的总数是 CROPS 量表得分总变异的一个归因因素。利用主成分因子分析对 CROPS 量表 26 个条目分为五因子，第一因子为回避和抑郁因子，第二因子为闪入思想和 第四因子为自伤感和罪恶感因子, 第三因子为躯体症状因子, 高警觉因子,
第五因子为睡眠障碍因子；其中第四因子具有区分特殊学校学生与普通学
校学生能力；特殊学校学生在 CROPS 量表症状总均分比普通学校学生高且
有统计学意义；心理问题检出组(以 YSR 为标准)在 CROPS 量表总分均数
CROPS 比非检出组高且有统计学意义。量表 PTSD 症状总得分与 YSR 的各个
综合征的平均相关系数为 0.6332±0.1129，各系数均有统计学意义。
结论 :1?儿童青少年创伤事件终身经历问卷和创伤后症状量表(LITE-S 问卷和
CROPS 量表)达到我国心理测量学信度与效度的基本要求。?
2?可以引入儿童青少年创伤事件终身经历问卷和创伤后症状量表用于
8-18 岁儿童青少年团体测量与比较。
关键词I
：儿童青少年，创伤事件，创伤后症状，信度，效度Abstract?
Object :Validating Chinese Version of the Life Incidence of Traumatic Event-
Student form and Child-report Posttraumatic Symptom introduced from USA ,in order
to evaluating its utility locallyMethod : The cluster sampling method was employed to recruit the 8-18 pupils and
students in the normal community schools and two special school, one school for the
deaf-mutes and the other one for borderline delinquency male
student .Achenbach’s
YSR was chosen to serve as the validity criteria .The translation and back translation
procedure was undertaken according to the author’s recommendation .Several
psychometrical indicators were analyzed for reliability and validity about the
POECES
Chinese version of LITE-S and CROPS, such as Cronbach’s alpha coefficient,
test-retest coefficient, content validity , construct validity ,discriminate
validity ,criteria validityResult: The Cronbach’s alpha coef ficient for LITE-S and CROPS was 0.794 and
0.903 respectively. The five-week test-retest coefficient for LITE-S and CROPS was
声波测井0.760 and 0.903, respectively. The total number of lifetime incidence traumatic events
accounted for a contributor of total score on CROPS. There five factors were
produced through the factor analysis with oblique rotation. The first factor was
avoidance and depression, the second was intrusion and high
arousal ,the third one
was somatic complaint, the forth was sense of guilty and sadness ,the fifth wasptv
sleeping disorder. Among these five factors, the forth factor discriminated between the
students from normal schools and special schools. Higher total mean score on CROPS
was found among the students from special schools than that of the students from
normal schools significantly .The students having behavior problems screened by
YSR were higher in total mean score on CROPS than those of the students without
having behavior problems statistically. The average coefficient between the total score
on CROPS and the eight symptoms defined by YSR was 0.6332±0.1129. All theIIcoefficients were significant statisticallyConclusion :1 The Chinese version of LITE-S and CROPS which are the screening tools of traumatic events and posttraumatic symptom for children and adolescents
introduced from USA meet the important psychometrical requirements2 LITE-S and CROPS can serve as the candidate for screening traumatic
events and posttraumatic symptom in groups of children and adolescents aged 8-18for the purpose of measuring and comparing within groups
Key word: Child and adolescent, traumatic event, posttraumatic symptom, reliability ,
validity
III目录
中?文?摘要I?
英?文?摘要. II目?录. IV1??前 ?言1?
少年1.1?儿童青 P 筛查、评定、诊断的研究 1?
多媒体网络教室
少年创伤事件和 1.2?儿童青 P 流行病学研究 4?
少年1.3?儿童青 P 病因学和发病机制理论研究. 8?
4?儿童青 1. 少年 D SPT 预研究干9方?法 ?材?料 2??与10?
2.1 材料10?
2.2?方法12sdh传输
3?结果15?
3.1 一般情况. 15?
3.2?YSR 情况回答 16?
3.3 信度检验. 16?
3.4 效度检验. 17
4?讨?论 33?
1?信度检 4. 验. 33?
豫公网安备41160202000603
站长QQ:729038198
关于我们
投诉建议