魔鬼经济学(英文版)

Freakonomics
by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner
INTRODUCTION: The Hidden Side of Everything瑞利数
Anyone living in the United States in the early 1990s and paying even a whisper of
attention to the nightly news or a daily paper could be forgiven for having been scared
out of his skin.
The culprit was crime. It had been rising relentlessly—a graph plotting the crime rate in
any American city over recent decades looked like a ski slope in profile—and it seemed
now to herald the end of the world as we knew it. Death by gunfire, intentional and
otherwise, had become commonplace. So too had carjacking and crack dealing, robbery
and rape. Violent crime was a gruesome, constant companion. And things were about to
get even worse. Much worse. All the experts were saying so.
大奔s600
The cause was the so-called superpredator. For a time, he was everywhere. Glowering
from the cover of newsweeklies. Swaggering his way through foot-thick government
reports. He was a scrawny, big-city teenager with a cheap gun in his hand and nothing in
his heart but ruthlessness. There were thousands out there just like him, we were told, a
generation of killers about to hurl the country into deepest chaos.
In 1995 the criminologist James Alan Fox wrote a report for the U.S. attorney general
that grimly detailed the coming spike in murders by teenagers. Fox proposed optimistic
and pessimistic scenarios. In the optimistic scenario, he believed, the rate of teen
homicides would rise another 15 percent over the next decade; in the pessimistic
贝雷架scenario, it would more than double. “The next crime wave will get so bad,” he said,
“that it will make 1995 look like the good old days.”
Other criminologists, political scientists, and similarly learned forecasters laid out the
same horrible future, as did President Clinton. “We know we’ve got about six years to
turn this juvenile crime thing around,” Clinton said, “or our country is going to be living
with chaos. And my successors will not be giving speeches about the wonderful
opportunities of the global economy; they’ll be trying to keep body and soul together for
people on the streets of these cities.” The smart money was plainly on the criminals.
And then, instead of going up and up and up, crime began to fall. And fall and fall and
fall some more. The crime drop was startling in several respects. It was ubiquitous, with
every category of crime falling in every part of the country. It was persistent, with
incremental decreases year after year. And it was entirely unanticipated—especially by
the very experts who had been predicting the opposite.
The magnitude of the reversal was astounding. The teenage murder rate, instead of rising
脱氧剂100 percent or even 15 percent as James Alan Fox had warned, fell more than 50 percent
within five years. By 2000 the overall murder rate in the United States had dropped to its
lowest level in thirty-five years. So had the rate of just about every other sort of crime,
from assault to car theft.
Even though the experts had failed to anticipate the crime drop—which was in fact well
under way even as they made their horrifying predictions—they now hurried to explain it.
Most of their theories sounded perfectly logical. It was the roaring 1990s economy, they
said, that helped turn back crime. It was the proliferation of gun control laws, they said. It
机器人巡检was the sort of innovative policing strategies put into place in New York City, where
murders would fall from 2,245 in 1990 to 596 in 2003.
These theories were not only logical; they were also encouraging, for they attributed the
crime drop to specific and recent human initiatives. If it was gun control and clever police
strategies and better-paying jobs that quelled crime—well then, the power to stop
criminals had been within our reach all along. As it would be the next time, God forbid,
威坪中学that crime got so bad.
These theories made their way, seemingly without question, from the experts’ mouths to
journalists’ ears to the public’s mind. In short course, they became conventional wisdom.
There was only one problem: they weren’t true.
There was another factor, meanwhile, that had greatly contributed to the massive crime
drop of the 1990s. It had taken shape more than twenty years earlier and concerned a

本文发布于:2024-09-21 01:29:54,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/xueshu/279175.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:机器人   威坪   巡检
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
Copyright ©2019-2024 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 易纺专利技术学习网 豫ICP备2022007602号 豫公网安备41160202000603 站长QQ:729038198 关于我们 投诉建议