对学术期刊内容质量的新理解

学术期刊内容质量的新理解
作者:方志
来源:《出版科学》2013年第04
        [ zipa] 基于对传统纸质学术期刊阅读与网络阅读两种不同阅读方式的读者体的比较分析,指出造成传统纸质学术期刊发展困境的并非是笼统的网络阅读,而仅是数据库阅读。正是目前大规模发展的数据库割裂式阅读方式,造成对纸质学术期刊品牌的重大伤害。学术期刊应该从纸质阅读与数据库阅读的差异化视角,重新审视内容质量,在比较两种阅读方式的基础上,确认符合自身发展利益的整体内容质量观念。
        [关键词] 期刊 壶奥内容质量 跨国公司经营与管理网络阅读轴承座 纸质出版
        [中图分类号] G237 [文献标识码大唐营养师] A [文章编号光子学报] 1009-5853 2013 04-0037-05
        [Abstract] Based on the comparative analysis on the differential readers between the paper reading and the internet reading this article points out that it is not so much the network reading as the database reading which brings about the development dilemma of t
he traditional paper learned periodicals. Because it is the large-scale split reading model of the database reading not others that depressed the power of the brand of the learned periodicals.Alsothe article considers that the learned periodicals must rethink the quality of their contents provided the different reading models between the papers and the database. Only in this way the learned periodicals can establish the overall quality of the content which can benefit themselves most.

本文发布于:2024-09-23 15:26:41,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/xueshu/216311.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:阅读   纸质   学术期刊
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
Copyright ©2019-2024 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 易纺专利技术学习网 豫ICP备2022007602号 豫公网安备41160202000603 站长QQ:729038198 关于我们 投诉建议