纸质书和电子书辩论自由辩部分

电子书主要论据
1、获取资源的过程方便快捷,容量大,资源丰富。
the abundant resource guarantee a convenient access to get the right resource we right need.Comparing with traditional books,ebooks download and upload information online that make it easier to find current time information.
2、节省资源,保护森林:
数显计数器ebooks can save money and protect forest. ebooks can dramatically reduce the consume of paper and prevent wasting resource.So we hold the view that ebooks are better than paper books.
3、节省空间,便于携带。
Ebooks are convenient to take and they can save space.Comparing with heavy paper books, ebooks can be read everywhere and anytime,and you won’t be tired.
4、更加时尚个性化。
Ebooks are fashionable and personalized .It’s popular to read ebooks ,with cellphone,pocket computer or MP5,maybe on the bus,in the office.We can set background and mode on the software for reading.
So we are firmly believed that ebooks are better than paper books.
一辨
Honorable judges,distinguished guests,ladies and gentlemen,I am glad to stand here to say our opinions which are that ebooks are better than paper
books.+定义,限制在20词内
Here are our main reasons:Firstly, ebooks have abundant resource and it is convenient to search.Secondly, ebooks can save money and protect forest. ebooks can reduce the use of paper, avoid the waste of resources.Thirdly,ebooks are convenient to take and they can save space Compared with heavy paper books, e-books can be read at any time and any place.Finally, ebooks are fashionable and personalized.It is becoming a lifestyle.So,we are firmly believed that ebooks are better than paper books.
自由辩:
性价比高
Ebooks have high quality and reasonable price ,we can have a library by a mobile device.It is much more cheaper than paper books.I’d like to say,could you afford a library?
对方回答并反问电子书不够普及,学生上课都用纸质书?
机房环控
我方数据阐释。我方反问:纸质书难道不是对木材的浪费吗?
I'm afraid you are wrong.According to the fourth reading investigation made by Chinese institute of publishing science,traditional reading rate continued to decline for six years,and the amount of people reading ebooks is 7.5times more than before.
Another point is that the waste to forest.Each new book can be only made by wood,recycle can’t solve the problems completely.well…what do you
think?
对方回答并反问:电子污染,重金属污染如何解决。
我方回答:提到电子设备的污染问题,对方辩友难道因为污染而不用手机吗,会因为污染而不打电子游戏吗?与打dota想比,看电子书不是更有意义吗?
When it comes to pollution,I want to say,can you give up playing your mobile phone because of pollution?Can you promise not to play computer to protect our environment?Isn’t it more meaningful to read ebooks comparing with playing dota?
保健杯
对方拿道具举例,绿茶和冰红茶,感觉问题,文化气息。
我方回答:我们读的是内容,看的是文字,与借助的载体无关。
We think, we read the content, see the word, it has nothing to do with carrier. As we want to drink water, is it a very important question to use a bowl to drink or a cup to drink ?
对方反问:电子书主要是网络小说等等,没营养。
网络安全事件管理
我方回答:名著都会有电子版。反问对方搜资料问题
微服务开发Famous books also have electronic editions.If you want to read,you are bound to find it.I want to ask my fellow debaters,don’t you search informations from the Internet?Never?Aren’t there any useful inf
ormation?Really?Don’t you seek something about debate before class? 对方拿吉米和平板电脑做对比,反问说看电子书容易不专注。
我方回答:这是你的个人问题,不涉及电子书的优劣。
I think it is your personal problems,what you said is too far from our topic.If you ask a学霸to read ebooks,he also can read patiently.I agree that electronic devices have some disadvantages,but it has no connection with ebooks.
对方反问眼睛损伤,视力下降
我方回答:
损坏视力跟用眼习惯有关。看纸质书看久了也会对视力不好。
对方辩友敢确保看纸质书不会近视眼吗?敢问对方辩友是如何近视眼的呢?难道对方辩友在上大学之前一直在看电子书所以导致近视的吗?
bad eyes-using habits are significant influencing factors for shortsightedness,it will also damage you eyesight if you read a paper book for a long time.Other friends defense you can guarantee that readi
ng paper book will no cause shortsightedness in anyway?Does it mean before you go to university,you get you eye spoiled all by using ebook? 对方做出假设,如果看电子书眼睛早就瞎了。反问辐射问题
保健项链
我方回答:
这是可以通过技术手段来避免或消除的。从长远角度来看,随着科技的发展和技术的革新,电子产品的辐射即使无法消除,也会尽可能降到最低。反问:电子书不易被损坏,纸质书容易变旧。
OK,it’s a problem.But this negative impact can be reduced by some technical measure.In the long run,with the development of science and
technology,radiationfrom the electronic product can be reduced to fairly low if can not be eliminated.
Ebooks can’t be damaged easily,and paper books are easily become old.How do you see it?
对方回答并反问,你们书有坏的吗,电子设备容易坏掉没电。
我方回答:我方相信,我学院许多同学的吉米多维奇已经破损坏掉了。没电只是特殊状况。反问:电子书携带方便,纸质书能做到吗?
I want to say,many students’吉米多维奇has been shabby in our institute.I think it is a special situation when ebooks is out of power.Moreover,going out with fivemobile poweroutthere will not be harder than with apaper book.It is convenient to carry ebooks ,can paper books be so convenient either?
1、我们阅读电子书可以设置各种各样的背景,随时调整屏幕亮度以适应环境光线,试问纸质书可以吗?What’s more,We can adjust the screen brightness to adapt to the environment light, can paper books do this?电子资料可以复制查询备份Electronic resources can be copied,seek,backup,statistic and so on.在移动设备上阅读电子书给我们带来新鲜感。Reading on mobile devices is fresh for us.阅读电子书更有趣,内容丰富多彩。There are many electronic magazines do good sound and color,vivid pictures,seeing this kind of ebooks is better and has much fun.Besides,they are rich in contents with beautiful colors and interesting sounds.市场的调查结果显示电子书更受欢迎.当今社会是一个信息化

本文发布于:2024-09-22 03:44:57,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/tex/4/186727.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:电子书   反问   对方   污染   问题   纸质   回答
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
Copyright ©2019-2024 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 易纺专利技术学习网 豫ICP备2022007602号 豫公网安备41160202000603 站长QQ:729038198 关于我们 投诉建议