1.THBT cooperation better than competition in promoting social advancement.
正：cooperation is better than competition
Economic globalization,
During the APEC summit, Chinese president Xi Jinping and American president Barack Obama announced that their two nations would work to reduce greenhouse gases.
反：cooperation is not better than competition.
Without the competition between the
2.THW require all advertisers of medicines and health products to provide scientific evidence for their claims.
auts正：medicines and health products
反：advertisers
PM LO
DPM DLO
MG MO
GW OW
DPM:
(Opening remarks: using the steps as shown in PPT )
Mr. speaker, Members of the House, the leader of opposition today has told us that cooperation is not better than coopetition in promoting social advancement .
But we think this will not work well. We should…
In order to support our stance, today I will have one extension and one argument. Firstly, I will prove the workability of our plan, and the argument cares about….
But before that, I will give two rebuttals.
(Substantiation)
(I. Rebuttals )
(repairing -orientated rebuttal)1…..
(refutation-orientated rebuttal) 2…..
(Extensions)
(Challenging the burden of proof)
(Thinking of new arguments)卷绕
电池 (Conclusions)
To sum up, today I have given two rebuttals:
All those made our government side believe that
Mr. Speaker, members of the House, ladies and gentlemen:
(Opening remarks)
(Substantiation)
流(H)As the Deputy Leader of Opposition today, I would like to divide my speech into three parts: first I would like to give two rebuttals, afterwards I would like to give my arguments, and finally my conclusion.
(2 rebuttals)
Here are my arguments.
1….
2….
To conclude, as the DLO, I have claimed that media’s supervisory function cannot be replaced easily, and I have explained why this policy “banning media coverage” is unnecessary and why the government would definitely pay high price if issuing the ban. Balancing the advantages and disadvantages, this house believes that we should not ban media coverage of celebrities’ privacy.
GW:
Government Whip Speech
(Opening remarks-Comment on the Principle Issues)
Ladies and gentlemen, I regret to say that in this long-lasting debate we saw an opposition who overlooked the importance of celebrities ‘right to privacy and the necessities of protecting this privacy. They claimed that once a celebrity chose to step out into the public attention, he automatically agreed to give up his privacy right to fulfill the so-called “public duty”. Which is, in other words, since a celebrity has gained so much att
标准车当量数
ention and money from his career, he should therefore be willing to sacrifice his right to satisfy media and his fellow citizens in return. Firstly, we do not think it is the celebrities’ public duty to give up his privacy right. Rather, it is the celebrity’s privacy that is most easily harmed and need to be protected. Secondly, we believe by protecting this privacy we can protect more people from potential harm and guide the society towards a better social value. I will prove these two points in my following speech.
(Refutation)
1.Government should provide weapons (allow media supervision) instead of taking (coverage) rights away?
Firstly, coverage right doesn’t exist if it is about personal issues (privacy).
Secondly, based on this claim, we can also safely draw to a conclusion that government should come up with policies and laws as weapons to protect the privacy right of celebrities, not neglecting its duty and deprive this right from them.
2.Should a celebrity pay for his fame by giving up privacy?
No. Whatever he got from his career he paid for them through his hardwork and self-decipline. As for the opposition’s concern that celebrities may hide dirty little secrets and therefore have bad influence on public, we have already proved that government would supervise them with more solid and valid policies and laws, and we believe only the government has such authority to do so.
(Summary Model:AHRP)
Thoughout this debate, I see mainly two clashes.
Clash 1 Does the media coverage of celebrities’ privacy do such harm that it need to be banned?( YES)
Opposition: These coverages help to supervise celebrities, teach citizens right from wrong and send positive messages to the public.
Us: These coverages harm the celebrities and their families and friends by affecting their normal daily lives, sometimes even arousing personal attacks and insults.(ZGR)
These coverages harm the fans (esp. teenagers who looked up to their models) by misleading them to do the same thing their models drug abuse).
These coverages harm the whole society for the media, under its profit-driven nature, may form a competition of disclosing celebrities’ privacy. Even worse, to attract more attentain they may try to “create” privacy which is not true, causing greater chaos and disputes.
豫公网安备41160202000603
站长QQ:729038198
关于我们
投诉建议