中文摘要
反垄断法，从理论上讲属于经济法学当中市场竞争法的重要组成部分。它在国外又有“反托拉斯法”之称，是指在国内外经济活动当中，用以规范和控制垄断行为的立法、行政法规、规章及司法判例乃至延伸到国际条约的一系列制度。
反垄断法最早诞生于有“反垄断法之父”之称的美国，在十九世纪末二十世纪初，各主要资本主义国家由自由竞争主义进入到了垄断资本主义；与此同时，随着美国1929至1933年的经济大危机的爆发，自由竞争的资本主义的弊端逐渐显现，为了消除经济危机的影响，国家干预开始出现，而反垄断法就恰恰产生于这样的背景之下。我国在反垄断法领域是后进者，自2008年《中华人民共和国反垄断法》生效以来，从立法到执法等各个环节都经历了不懈的探索与实践，而在此期间也暴露出一系列无法避免的问题，但随着市场经济的深入和全面发展，特别是十八届三中全会中提出的市场在资源配置中决定性作用和相关方面积累的经验，正如本文将要研究的高通案的成功解决，这些都反映出我国的反垄断执法水平并非处在“婴儿”阶段。
我国的反垄断法规制以下四种垄断行为，分别是垄断协议（包括横向垄断协议和纵向垄断协议）、经营者集中、滥用市场支配地位以及行政性垄断。高通案涉及的就是有关滥用市场支配地位的问题。本文以高通
案为研究对象，从相关市场、市场支配地位的认定以及滥用市场支配地位的具体行为三个角度对该案进行深入和全面地分析；此外，由于本案还涉及到其他法学类学科如专利法、以及经济学的分析方法等等，因此文章在分析时采用了有关方法进行了辅助性分析。在行文的最后，是对相关法律问题进行的思考与有关法律完善的建议。
关键词：相关市场，市场支配地位，滥用市场支配地位的行为
The Legal Analysis of Qualcomm's Abuse of Dominant
Market Position
Abstract
Antitrust law,in theory,is an important part of market competition law in economic law.It is in a foreign country and"antitrust law",which refers to the domestic and foreign economic activities,in order to standardize and control monopoly legislation,administrative regulations and rules and judicial precedent and extends to a series of international treaty system.
Antitrust law was originated in the"anti monopoly law"the father of the United States,at the end of nineteenth Century and early twentieth Century,the doctrine of free competition in major capitalist coun
tries into monopoly capitalism;at the same time,with the economic crisis in the United States in19331929to burst,abuse of free competition capitalism appears gradually.In order to eliminate the influence of the economic crisis,the state intervention began to appear,the anti-monopoly law is produced in this context.China is a latecomer in the field of anti-monopoly law,since2008since the entry into force of the"People's Republic of China anti-monopoly law", have gone through unremitting exploration and practice from legislation to law enforcement and other aspects,but also exposed a series of questions can not be avoided,but with the all-round development and the deepening of the market economy,especially the decisive in the third Plenary Session of the18th CPC Central Committee the market in the allocation of resources and related experience,as this will be the case of Qualcomm case successfully solved,these are reflected in China's anti-monopoly law enforcement level and not in its infancy.
China's anti-monopoly law regulation of the following four kinds of monopolistic behavior, namely,the monopoly agreements(including horizontal and vertical monopoly agreements),the concentration of operators,abuse of dominant market position and administrative monopoly. Qualcomm is related to the issue of abuse of dominant market position.This paper is to Qualcomm case as the research object,from the three angles that the relevant market,the dominant market status and the specific acts
of abusing the dominant market status of in-depth and comprehensive analysis of the case;in addition,the case also involves other disciplines such as law,patent law and economics analysis method and so on,so based on the analysis of the relevant methods of auxiliary analysis.At the end of the article,it is the consideration of the legal issues
related to the analysis of the case and the improvement of relevant laws.
Key words:Related Market,Market Dominance,Abuse of Dominant Market Position
目录
中文摘要.......................................................................................................II 绪论. (1)
第一节选题背景及意义 (1)
第二节研究方法与研究综述 (1)
第一章高通案案情及焦点问题概述 (3)
第一节基本案情介绍 (3)
第二节主要焦点问题归纳 (5)
第二章高通案焦点及相关问题的法理分析 (7)
第一节高通公司所处相关市场的研究 (7)
一、相关市场的规定 (7)
二、界定相关市场的影响因素 (7)
三、本案相关市场的界定 (8)
第二节高通公司市场支配地位的认定 (10)
一、有关市场支配地位的规定 (10)
二、市场支配地位的界定标准 (11)
三、本案市场支配地位的认定 (12)
第三节高通公司滥用市场支配地位行为的判定 (14)
一、滥用市场支配地位行为的规定 (14)
二、滥用市场支配地位的行为种类 (15)
三、本案滥用市场支配地位的行为分析 (16)
第四节行政处罚决定与的合法性 (18)
一、发改委整改决定的分析 (18)
二、的合法性分析 (19)
第三章高通案相关法律思考 (21)
第一节细化滥用市场支配地位行为的规定 (21)
第二节完善滥用市场支配地位的法律责任 (21)
第三节加速出台相关执法细则 (22)
结语 (24)
参考文献 (25)
致谢 (27)
豫公网安备41160202000603
站长QQ:729038198
关于我们
投诉建议