Journal of Communication and Computer 9 (2012) 905-908
DAVID PUBLISHING
Teachers as Collaborators to Motivate Learning
Autonomy in English Speaking Class—Two Cases at a
Senior High School and a University
Yiling Chen
Nanhua University, Chiayi 622, Taiwan
Received: May 31, 2012 / Accepted: July 03, 2012 / Published: August 30, 2012.
Abstract: The notion of collaborative learning and teaching encourages learners to learn a language by experiential and shared learning.
The learners are believed to learn best if they learn through the conscious internalization of their own or observed experiences which
build upon our past experiences or knowledge. Within this concept, teachers become collaborators to enhance learners’ learning
autonomy in the teaching process. In this paper, the authors will consider to what extent the concept of a teacher as a collaborator can be
applied to the senior high school and university EFL classes in Taiwan, and how to motivate an EFL learners’ autonomy. Attention is
first paid to the theoretical grounding of the concept and the characteristics of teachers as collaborators. Following this, the English
education context in Taiwan is highlighted in order to consider how far this concept can be achieved. Finally, conclusions will be drawn
from this small-scale exploration.
Key words: Teacher as collaborator, learning autonomy.
l Rights Reserved.
1. Introduction
When we consider foreign language education, the
main aspects in our mind are learners and teachers.
There is a great variety in the literature on foreign
language acquisition both in the reasons why
individuals learn foreign languages, and in their
success in doing so. We also find variety in the ways in
which teachers conduct their teaching activity. There is
a notion of collaborative learning and teaching in
foreign language education, which “has emerged over
the last ten years as the significant concept within the
field of language education” [1]. This concept focuses
on learners and encourages them to learn language by
experiential and shared learning. Within this concept,
the role of teachers as collaborators in the teaching and
learning process represents a change to the traditional
educational patterns.
Corresponding author: Yiling Chen, Ed.D, assistant
professor, research fields: TESOL, bilingual education. E-mail:
***************..
The author carried out experimental teaching
(namely “collaborative teaching”, which is different
from traditional lecturing teaching) for a semester at a
senior high school and a university. The courses chosen
for experimental teaching were “ practical English” for
majors in the Department of Applied English at a
vocational senior high school, and “English
Audio-Visual Training” for majors in Department of
Foreign Languages and Literature at a university.
During the academic year, the first semester was taught
in the traditional way, and the second semester was
taught by collaborative teaching. In this paper the
author will only consider to what extent the concept of
a teacher as a collaborator can be applied to the English
(as foreign language) educational contexts both at a
senior high school and at a university in Taiwan.
Attention firstly is paid to the theoretical grounding of
the concept and characteristics of a teacher as a
collaborator. Following this, the English educational
contexts in both schools are highlighted in order to
906Teachers as Collaborators to Motivate Learning Autonomy in English Speaking Class—Two Cases at a
Senior High School and a University
consider how far this concept can be achieved. Finally,
conclusions will be drawn from this small-scale
exploration.
2. Literature Review
It is believed that when students sense they are
finding out something that is important and useful to
them, using their own powers of observation and
interpersonal skills, everything changes. Therefore, we,
as teachers, should not only lecture in class but also
encourage hands-on exercises. We want to be sure that
they “really learn something useful and meaningful”;
the notion of “experiential learning” emerged in the
1960s [2]. Kolb’s [3] general theoretical model of
experiential learning has had outstanding influence. In
experiential learning, personal experience is viewed as
the central point for learning, giving “life, texture, and
subjective personal meaning to abstract concepts and at
the same time providing a concrete, publicly shared
reference point for testing the implications and validity
of ideas created during the leaning process [3]”. In this
model, reflection plays an important role in the process
by providing a bridge between experience and
theoretical conceptualisation.
The context of foreign language education is
changing with many new competing theories,
including the development of experiential learning.
Kohonen [4] mentions that “current pedagogical
thinking seems to be shifting away from the traditional
behaviouristic model of teaching as transmission of
knowledge towards an experiential model whereby
teaching is seen as transformation of existing or partly
understood knowledge, based on constructivist view of
learning [4]”. Miller [5] presents a table to compare the
traditional model with the experiential model. In
experiential model, control of the process is shifted
from the teacher towards the learner. Learners are at the
centre. Learning starts with the goals chosen by
learners themselves. To a great extent, the teacher
cooperatively facilitates learners to achieve their goals
in a small group setting. These distinctions, compared
to the traditional model, not only influence physical
settings in foreign language education, such as the
structuring the classroom, but also have great effects on
the role of the teacher in learning and teaching process.
In next part, the focus will be shift to the characteristics
of a teacher as a collaborator in the cooperative foreign
language class.
3. Applicability
The concept of a teacher as a collaborator seems
very influential and significant. The aim is to
encourage the learner to learn autonomously. However,
from my point of view, this concept would be difficult
to apply to foreign language education in Taiwan, since
it challenges the educational and cultural context in
Taiwan. I would like to explain this from three aspects.
Firstly, this concept challenges the meaning of
teacher in Taiwanese cultural context. In a
collaborative learning class, one major change is the
role of the teacher. The teacher is most likely to be a
member of the learners’ group, a collaborator. This
change is not entirely “new” but still too “advanced”to
be accepted, especially in a high school context. Our
culture pays a high degree of respect to the role of
teacher, which even can be traced back thousands of
years. We transmit the notion of Confucius: to respect
the teacher. We believe that the teacher is the person
who teaches knowledge and copes with the complexity
of life. In this cultural context, children are educated to
respect their teachers and follow their teacher’s words.
The author find out that the notion of “teacher as
authority” contradicts with the age of learners. That is
to say, it is easier to implement collaborative teaching
with older learners. The authors take this experimental
teaching for example, it was easier to apply
collaborative teaching in a university context than in a
high school context. Further, the learner autonomy of
undergraduates was more likely to be encouraged than
in senior high students. The high school students in this
study could not even accept the notion of collaborative
teaching, which required their efforts to do something
l Rights Reserved.
Teachers as Collaborators to Motivate Learning Autonomy in English Speaking Class—Two Cases at a
907Senior High School and a University
by themselves instead of reciting textbooks. Most of
them were reluctant to research or do reports on their
own, mainly because it was not the objective with
which they had grown up. In this sense, the concept of
the teacher as a collaborator would be restricted in its
application in certain educational contexts.
Secondly, the current foreign language education
pattern in primary and secondary schools in Taiwan is
difficult to change more generally. In our foreign
language class, the number of pupils is normally
between 50 and 60. Such a big size restricts the
teacher’s behaviour. The teacher cannot physically
arrange group learning in one classroom, because the
space is limited, and it is easy to be out of control.
Pupils must be arranged in a very structured form. The
teacher stands in the front and lectures to the whole
class. The demonstration is in a single form,
teacher-dominated. As McDonell [6] states, “when the
teacher intervenes, there are demonstrations of
problem-solving language and behaviours; when
students are encouraged to go back over a discussion to
pursue a new strategy, there are demonstrations of
negotiation; when students are asked to reflect on how
the group worked together, there are demonstrations of
cooperative skills”. In conclusion, this
multi-demonstration classroom has not been achieved
at senior high school, but partially accomplished in the
university setting. For example, because of the large
number of pupils in a single class at high school, it can
be imagined how difficult it was to encourage active
learning. When the author negotiated with individuals
to set goals and meet their needs by consideration of
individual’s language level, the author was always in a
dilemma. How could teachers plan a lesson to meet an
individual’s interest and pay attention to their language
ability at same time? Further, the 50 students at this age
did not actually know what they wanted to learn. As a
result, the motivation of both high and low level pupils
was decreased. In addition, in this high school, the
school had an English (as foreign language) textbook
for all and it was difficult to design collaborative class
activities. Thus, the outlook for the application of this
concept is not very optimistic in a senior high school
setting. By contrast, the situation at a university was
easier. Instructors at the university were allowed to
choose textbooks freely and the number of students in
the Department of Foreign Languages and Literature is
comparatively small. It was unproblematic for me to
move students around or design an active exercise in
class. Further, my students enjoyed collaborative
teaching more than a dull, lecturing lesson. They
learned better when materials were related to their daily
lives or were presented by peers.
Thirdly, assessment in foreign language education
provides barriers against this concept in a senior high
school context. Our basic approach in assessing senior
high students was external summative assessment. All
of the national assessments are paper-based, and assess
vocabulary, grammar, reading, and writing, without
listening and speaking. That is, communicative skills
are omitted. The method and content of assessment
limits a language teacher’s behaviours. This kind of
assessment-driven teaching and learning is consistent
with the idea of backwash, as Johnson [7] states, which
is “the effect that testing has on teaching”. For better or
worse, tests and examinations exert control over what
goes on in a classroom. Teachers cannot focus on the
communication of language by adopting communicative
approaches because students are not assessed
communicatively. In this situation, there is no space to
achieve collaborative language learning in senior high
schools. Fortunately, on the other hand, undergraduates
do not have further entrance exams, unless they want to
go on to graduate school. Further, one of the core
teaching objectives at the university is to encourage the
innovation and creativity of students; therefore,
implementing collaborative teaching was not difficult
while the experimental teaching was carried out.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, attention was firstly paid to the
theoretical grounds for the concept of collaborative
l Rights Reserved.
908Teachers as Collaborators to Motivate Learning Autonomy in English Speaking Class—Two Cases at a
Senior High School and a University
learning and teaching and the characteristics of a
teacher as a collaborator. Following that, the
application of this concept in a Taiwanese context was
considered, at both a senior high school and a
university. The conclusion drawn from this exploration
is that although the concept of a teacher as a
collaborator is valuable, and is one that aims at
encouraging autonomous learning, it is difficult to
apply this to foreign (English) language education in
senior high schools because of the boundaries of
culture and the educational context. However, this does
not mean I reject entirely the idea. It is still worthwhile
for individual Taiwanese foreign language teachers to
reflect on personal experience and improve
professional skills by considering this concept, and
implementing at senior high schools if possible. In
contrast, the notion can and should be carried out in
university setting since instructors at universities have
more decision-making rights and universities are
regarded as “authority-free teaching lands”. As
Andresen et al [8]. points out, collaborative learning is
where learners are personally engaged or where their
related experience plays a significant role in the
process of learning and cognition development.
References
[1] D. Nunan, Collaborative Language Learning and
Teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1992.
[2] W.J. McKeachie, M. Svinicki, Teaching Tips: Strategies,
Research and Theory for College and University Teaching,
Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2006.
[3] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source
of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, N.J., 1984.
[4] V. Kohonen, Experiential language learning: Second
language learning as cooperative learner education, in: D.
Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative Language Learning and
Teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992,
pp. 14-39.
[5] J. Miller, The Holistic Curriculum, OISE Press, Toronto,
1988.
[6] W. McDonell, The role of the teacher in the cooperative
learning classroom, in: C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative
Language Teaching, Prentice Hall Regents, N. J., 1992, pp.
162-174.
[7] K. Johnson, An Introduction to Foreign Language
Learning and Teaching, Longman, Harlow, 2001.
[8] L. Andresen, D. Baud, R. Cohen, Experience-Based
Learning in Understanding Adult Education and Training,
Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 2000, pp. 225-239.
l Rights Reserved.
本文发布于:2024-09-20 22:40:22,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/fanyi/47833.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |