1.
syntax: the study of the rules governing the ways different constituents are combined to
form sentences in a language, or the study of the interrelationships between elements in
sentence structures.
co-occurrence: It means that words of different sets of clauses may permit, or require,
the occurrence of a word of another set or class to form a sentence or a particular part of a
sentence. For instance, what can precede a noun (dog) is usually the determiners and
adjectives, and what can follow it when it takes the position of subject will be predicators
such as
bark, bite, run, etc. In short, co-occurrence is the syntactic environment in which a
construction, with its relevant elements, can appear grammatically and conventionally. Thus
relations of co-occurrence partly belong to syntagmatic relations, partly to paradigmatic
relations.
construction: it refers to any syntactic construct which is assigned one or more
conventional functions in a language, together with whatever is linguistically
conventionalized about its contribution to the meaning or use construct contains. It can be
further divided into the external and internal properties. Take sentence
The boy kicked the
ball as an example, we will determine the external syntax as an independent clause, while NP
(―the boy‖), VP (―kicked‖) and NP (―the ball‖) will be assigned respectively to the different
elements in this clause.
constituent: Constituent is a term used in structural sentence analysis for every linguistic
unit, which is a part of a larger linguistic unit. Several constituents together form a
construction: for example, in the sentence
The boy ate the apple,
S (A), the boy (B), ate the
apple(C),
each part is a constituent. Constituents can be joined together with other
constituents to form larger units. If two constituents, in the case of the example above, B (the
boy) and C (ate the apple), are joined to form a hierarchically higher constituent A (―S‖, here a
sentence), then B and C are said to be immediate constituents of A.
endocentric: Endocentric construction is one whose distribution is functionally equivalent
to that of one or more of its constituents, i.e., a word or a group of words, which serves as a
definable Centre or Head. In the phrase
two pretty girls,
girls is the Centre or Head of this
phrase or word group.
exocentric: Exocentric construction refers to a group of syntactically related words where
none of the words is functionally equivalent to the group as a whole, that is, there is no
definable "Centre" or "Head" inside the group. Exocentric construction usually includes basic
sentence, prepositional phrase, predicate (verb + object) construction, and connective (be +
complement) construction. In the sentence
The boy smiled, neither constituent can substitute
for the sentence structure as a whole.
1
coordination: A common syntactic pattern in English and other languages is formed by
grouping together two or more categories of the same type with the help of a conjunction
such as
and, but or
or. This phenomenon is known as coordination. In the construction
the
lady or
the tiger, both NPs
the lady and
the tiger have equivalent syntactic status, each of the
separate constituents can stand for the original construction functionally.
subordination: Subordination refers to the process or result of linking linguistic units so
that they have different syntactic status, one being dependent upon the other, and usually a
constituent of the other. Thus the subordinate constituents are words which modify the Head.
Consequently, they can be called modifiers. In the phrase
swimming in the lake,
swimming is
the head and
in the lake are the words modifying the head.
category: The term category in some approaches refers to classes and functions in its
narrow sense, e.g., noun, verb, subject, predicate, noun phrase, verb phrase, etc. More
specifically, it refers to the defining properties of these general units: the categories of the
noun, for example, include number, gender, case and countability; and of the verb, for
example, tense, aspect, voice, and so on.
agreement: Agreement (or concord) may be defined as the requirement that the forms of
two or more words of specific word classes that stand in specific syntactic relationship with
one another shall also be characterized by the same paradigmatically marked category (or
categories). For instance, the syntactic relationship between
this pen and
it in the following
dialogue:
--Whose is this pen?
--Oh, it’s the one I lost.
embedding: Embedding refers to the means by which one clause is included in another
clause in syntactic subordination. E.g.,
I saw the man who had visited you last year.
recursiveness: it mainly means that a phrasal constituent can be embedded within (i.e.,
be dominated by) another constituent having the same category, but it can be used to any
means to extend any constituent. Together with openness, recursiveness is the core of
creativity of language. For example,
―I met a man who had a son whose wife sold cookies that
she had baked in her kitchen that was fully equipped with electrical appliances that were
new‖.
grammatical subject & logical subject: Grammatical and logical subjects are two terms
accounting for the case of subject in passive voice. Take the sentences
a dog bit John and
John was bitten by a dog as examples. Since the core object noun (John in this case) sits in the
slot before the verb in the passive, it is called grammatical subject, for the original object
noun phrase occupies the grammatical space before a verb, the space that a subject normally
occupies; the core subject (a dog), now the object of a preposition (by
a dog), is called a
2
logical subject, since semantically the core subject still does what a subject normally does: it
performs an action.
cohesion: Cohesion refers to relations of meaning that exist within the text, and that
define it as a text. The cohesive devices usually include: conjunction, ellipsis, lexical
collocation, lexical repetition, reference, substitution, and so on. In the following example,
the cohesive device is ―Reference‖, that is, ―it‖ refers back to
the door:
He couldn't open the
door. It was locked tight.
3.
(a) ((The) (boy)) ((was) (crying)).
(b) (Shut) ((the) (door)).
(c) ((Open) ((the) (door))) (quickly).
(d) ((The) (((happy) (teacher)) ((in) ((that) (class))))) ((was) ((beaming) (away))).
(e) (He) (((bought) ((an) ((old) (car)))) ((with) ((his) ((first) ((pay) (cheque)))))).
2.
(1) The instructor told the students to study. [NP(det.+n.)+V+NP(det.+n.)+inf.]
(2) The customer requested for a cold beer. [NP(det+n.)+V+PP(prep.+det.+adj.+n.)]
(3) The pilot landed the jet. [NP(det+n)+V+NP(det+n.)]
(4) These dead trees must be removed. [NP(det+adj.+n.)+mv(modal verb)+be(auxiliary
verb)+Past Participle]
(5) That glass suddenly broke. [NP(det+n)+adv.+V]
4.
(a) Ducks quack. (non-headed, independent clause)
(b) The ladder in the shed is long enough. (non-headed, prepositional phrase)
(c) I saw a bridge damaged beyond repair. (headed; headword—damaged; adjectival
group)
(d) Singing hymns is forbidden in some countries. (headed; headword—singing;
gerundial phrase)
(e) His handsome face appeared in the magazine. (headed; headword—face; nominal
group)
3
(f) A lady of great beauty came out. (non-headed; prepositional phrase)
(g) He enjoys climbing high mountains. (headed; headword—climbing; gerundial phrase)
(h)The man nodded patiently. (non-headed; a sentence)
(i) A man roused by the insult drew his sword. (headed; headword—roused; adjectival
phrase)
5.
a. N b. Y c. Y d. Y e. Y f. N g. Y h. N
6.
(a) The comet that Dr. Okada discovered appears every twenty years.
(b) Everyone respected the quarterback who refused to give up.
(c) The most valuable experiences that I had on my trip to Europe were small ones.
(d) Children whose parents abuse alcohol will probably become abusers of drugs or
alcohol.
(e) Many nations are restricting emissions of noxious gases which threaten the
atmosphere.
7.
In this chapter, several ways to extend syntactic constituents are brought under the
category of recursiveness, including coordination and subordination, conjoining and
embedding, hypotactic and paratactic and so on. Coordination and conjoining are the
different names for the same linguistic phenomenon, that is, to use
and,
but or
or to join
together syntactic constituents with the same function. For instance, the sentence
A man got
into the car could be extended into a sentence like this "[NP A man, a woman, a boy, a car and
a dog] got into the car". While subordination and embedding can be understood as the
extension of any syntactic constituent by inserting one or more syntactic elements with
different functions into another.
I saw the man who had visited you last year is an extended
sentence by changing the independent clause
The man had visited you last year into a
dependent element (here a relative clause).
However, hypotaxis and parataxis are the two traditional terms for the description of
syntactic relations between sentences. In the examples below, the former is hypotactic, while
the latter is paratactic:
We live near the sea. So we enjoy a healthy climate.
He dictated the letter. She wrote it.
8.
4
(a) The best thing would be to leave early. (infinitive phrase)
(b) It's great for a man to be free. (infinitive phrase)
(c) Having finished their task, they came to help us. (past participial phrase)
(d) Xiao Li being away, Xiao Wang had to do the work. (absolute phrase)
(e) Filled with shame, he left the house. (past participial phrase)
(f) All our savings gone, we started looking for jobs. (absolute phrase)
(g) It's no use crying over spilt milk. (gerundial phrase)
(h) Do you mind my opening the window? (gerundial phrase)
9.
The grammatical category ―subject‖ in different language possesses different
characteristics. In English, ―subject‖ may have the following characteristics:
A. Word order: Subject ordinarily precedes the verb in statement such as ―Sally collects
stamps".
B. Pronoun forms: The first and third person pronouns in English appear in a special form
when the pronoun is a subject. This form is not used when the pronoun occurs in other
positions:
He loves me.
I love him.
We threw stones at them.
They threw stones at us.
C. Agreement with verb: In the simple present tense, an –s is added to the verb when a
third person subject is singular. However, the number and person of the object or any other
element in the sentence have no effect at all on the form of the verb:
She angers him.
They anger him.
She angers them.
D. Content questions: if the subject is replaced by a question word (who or
what), the rest
of the sentence remains unchanged, as in (b). But when any other element of the sentence is
replaced by a question word, an auxiliary verb must appear before the subject. If the basic
sentence does not contain an auxiliary verb, we must insert
did or
do(es) immediately after
the question word, as in (d, e)
5
(a) John stole/would steal Mrs. Thatcher’s picture from the British Council.
(b) Who stole/would steal Mrs. Thatcher’s picture from the British council?
(c) What would John steal, if he had the chance?
(d) What did John steal from the British Council?
(e) Where did John steal Mrs. Thatcher’s picture from?
E. Tag question: A tag question is used to seek confirmation of a statement. It always
contains a pronoun which refers back to the subject, and never to any other element in the
sentence:
John loves Mary, doesn’t he?
6
本文发布于:2024-09-23 05:27:24,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/fanyi/36176.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |