Unit 7 Simplicity (William Zinsser)
I Clutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary
words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaningless jargon.
2 Who really knows what the average businessman is trying to say in the average
business letter? What member of an insurance or medical plan can decipher the brochure that
tells him what his costs and benefits are? What father or mother can put together a child’s toy -
on Christmas Eve or any other eve – from the instructions on the box? Our national tendency is to
inflate and thereby sound important. The airline pilot who wakes us to announce that he is
presently anticipating experiencing considerable weather wouldn’t dream of saying that there's a
storm ahead and it may get bumpy. The sentence is too simple --there must be something
wrong with it.
3 But the secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components.
Every word that serves no function, every long word that could be a short word, every adverb
which carries the same meaning that is already in the verb, every passive construction that leaves
the reader unsure of who is doing what - these are the thousand and one adulterants that
weaken the strength of a sentence. And they usually occur, ironically, in proportion to
education and rank.
4 During the late 1960's the president of Princeton University wrote a letter to mollify
the alumni after a spell of campus unrest. “You are probably aware," he began,“that we have
been experiencing very considerable potentially explosive expressions of dissatisfaction on issues
only partially related. " He meant that the students had been hassling them about different things.
As an alumnus I was far more upset by the president’s syntax than by the students’ potentially
explosive expressions of dissatisfaction. I would have preferred the presidential approach taken
by Franklin D. Roosevelt when he tried to convert into English his own government’s memos,
such as this blackout order of 1942:
Such preparations shall be made as will completely obscure all Federal buildings and
non-Federal buildings occupied by the Federal government during an air raid for any period of
time from visibility by reason of internal or external illumination.
5 “Tell them," Roosevelt said, “that in buildings where they have to keep the work going
to put something across the windows.”
Simplify, simplify. Thoreau said it, as we are so often re-minded, and no American writer
more consistently practiced what he preached. Open Walden to any page and you will find a man
saying in a plain and orderly way what is on his mind:
I love to be alone. I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude. We
are for the most part more lonely when we go abroad among men than when we stay in our
chambers. A man thinking or working is always alone, let him be where he will. Solitude is not
measured by the miles of space that intervene between a man and his fellows. The really diligent
student in one of the crowded hives of Cambridge College is as solitary as a dervish in the desert.
6 How can the rest of us achieve such enviable freedom from clutter? The answer is to
clear our heads of clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing: one can't exist without the
other. It is impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English. He may get away with it for a
paragraph or two, but soon the reader will be lost, and there is no sin so grave, for he will not
easily be lured back.
7 Who is this elusive creature, the reader? He is a person with an attention span of about
twenty seconds. He is assailed on every side by forces competing for his time: by newspapers
and magazines, by television and radio and stereo, by his wife and children and pets, by his house
and his yard and all the gadgets that he has bought to keep them spruce, and by that most potent
of competitors, sleep. The man snoozing in his chair with an unfinished magazine open on his lap
is a man who is being given too much unnecessary trouble by the writer.
8 It won’t do to say that the snoozing reader is too dumb or too lazy to keep pace with
the train of thought. My sympathies are with him. If a reader is lost, it is generally because the
writer has not been careful enough to keep him on the path.
9 This carelessness can take any number of forms. Perhaps a sentence is so excessively
cluttered that the reader, hacking his way through the verbiage, simply doesn't know what it
means. Perhaps a sentence has been so shoddily constructed that the reader could read it in any
of several ways. Perhaps the writer has switched pronouns in mid-sentence, or has switched
tenses, so the reader loses track of who is talking or when the action took place. Perhaps
Sentence B is not a logical sequel to Sentence A – the writer, in whose head the connection is
clear, has not bothered to provide the missing link. Perhaps the writer has used an important
word incorrectly by not taking the trouble to look it up. He may think that "sanguine" and
"sanguinary" mean the same thing, but the difference is a bloody bid one. The reader can only
infer (speaking of' big differences) what the writer is trying to imply.
10 Faced with these obstacles, the reader is at first a remarkably tenacious bird. He
blames himself - he obviously missed something, and he goes back over the mystifying sentence,
or over the whole paragraph, piecing it out like an ancient rune, making guesses and moving on.
But he won't do this for long. The writer is making him work too hard, and the reader will look for
one who is better at his craft.
11 The writer must therefore constantly ask himself: What am I trying to say'? Surprisingly
often, he doesn't know. Then he must look at what he has written and ask: Have I said it? Is it
clear to someone encountering the subject for the first time? If it's not, it is because some fuzz
has worked its way into the machinery. The clear writer is a person clear-headed enough to see
this stuff for what it is: fuzz.
12 I don't mean that some people are born clear-headed and are therefore natural writers,
whereas others are naturally fuzzy and will never write well. Thinking clearly is a conscious act
that the writer must force upon himself, just as if he were embarking on any other project that
requires logic: adding up a laundry list or doing an algebra problem. Good writing doesn't come
naturally, though most people obviously think it does. The professional writer is forever being
bearded by strangers who say that they'd like to "try a little writing some time” when they retire
from their real profession. Good writing takes self-discipline and, very often, self-knowledge.
13 Many writers, for instance, can't stand to throw any-thing away. Their sentences
are littered with words that mean essentially the same thing and with phrases which make a
point that is implicit in what they have already said. When students give me these littered
sentences I beg them to select from the surfeit of words the few that most precisely fit what they
want to say. Choose one, I plead, from among the three almost identical adjectives. Get rid of
the unnecessary adverbs. Eliminate "in a funny sort of way” and other such qualifiers - they do
no useful work.
14 The students look stricken - I am taking all their wonderful words away. I am only
taking their superfluous words away, leaving what is organic and strong.
15 "But," one of my worst offenders confessed, "I never can get rid of anything -you
should see my room.” (I didn't take him up on the offer. ) "I have two lamps where I only need
one, but I can't decide which one I like better, so I keep them both.” He went on to enumerate
his duplicated or unnecessary objects, and over the weeks ahead I went on throwing away his
duplicated and unnecessary words. By the end of the term - a term that he found acutely painful -
his sentences were clean.
16 "I've had to change my whole approach to writing," he told me. "Now I have to
think before I start every sentence and I have to think about every word.” The very idea amazed
him. Whether his room also looked better I never found out. I suspect that it did.
本文发布于:2024-09-21 20:46:40,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/fanyi/23468.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |