HoneyMumford


2023年12月22日发(作者:ink是什么意思)

The Learning Styles Questionnaire (Honey & Mumford 1986)

(In - Honey, P., Mumford, A. (2006) Learning Styles Questionnaire: 80 Item Version. Peter

Honey Publications: London)

This questionnaire is designed to find out your preferred learning style(s). Over the

years you have probably developed learning 'habits' that help you benefit more from

some experiences than from others. Since you are probably unaware of this, this

questionnaire will help you pinpoint your learning preferences so that you are in a

better position to select learning experiences that suit your style.

There is no time limit to this questionnaire. It will probably take you 10-15 minutes.

The accuracy of the results depends on how honest you can be. There are no right

or wrong answers.

If you agree with a statement more than you disagree with it put a tick by it ().

If you disagree more than you agree put a cross by it

(). Be sure to mark each

statement with a tick or a cross.

1 I have strong beliefs about what is right and wrong, good and bad.

2 I often act without considering the possible consequences.

3 I tend to solve problems using a step-by-step approach.

4 I believe that formal procedures and policies restrict people.

5 I have a reputation for saying what I think, simply and directly.

6 I often find that actions based on feelings are as sound as those based on careful

thought and analysis.

7 I like the sort of work where I have time for thorough preparation and

implementation.

8 I regularly question people about their basic assumptions.

9 What matters most is whether something works in practice.

10 I actively seek out new experiences.

11 When I hear about a new idea or approach I immediately start working out how to

apply it in practice.

12 I am keen on self discipline such as watching my diet, taking regular exercise,

sticking to a fixed routine, etc.

1

13 I take pride in doing a thorough job.

14 I get on best with logical, analytical people and less well with spontaneous,

'irrational' people.

15 I take care over the interpretation of data available to me and avoid jumping to

conclusions.

16 I like to reach a decision carefully after weighing up many alternatives.

17 I'm attracted more to novel, unusual ideas than to practical ones.

18 I don't like disorganised things and prefer to fit things into a coherent pattern.

19 I accept and stick to laid down procedures and policies so long as I regard them

as an efficient way of getting the job done.

20 I like to relate my actions to a general principle.

21 In discussions I like to get straight to the point.

22 I tend to have distant, rather formal relationships with people at work.

23 I thrive on the challenge of tackling something new and different.

24 I enjoy fun loving, spontaneous people.

25 I pay meticulous attention to detail before coming to a conclusion.

26 I find it difficult to produce ideas on impulse.

27 I believe in coming to the point immediately.

28 I am careful not to jump to conclusions too quickly.

29 I prefer to have as many sources of information as possible - the more data to

think over the better.

30 Flippant people who don't take things seriously enough usually irritate me.

31 I listen to other people's points of view before putting my own forward.

32 I tend to be open about how I'm feeling.

33 In discussions I enjoy watching the manoeuvrings of the other participants.

34 I prefer to respond to events on a spontaneous, flexible basis rather than to plan

things out in advance.

2

35 I tend to be attracted to techniques such as network analysis, flow charts

branching programmes, contingency planning, etc.

36 It worries me if I have to rush out a piece of work to meet a tight deadline.

37 I tend to judge people's ideas on their practical merits.

38 Quiet, thoughtful people tend to make me feel uneasy.

39 I often get irritated by people who want to rush things.

40 It is more important to enjoy the present moment than to think about the past or

future.

41 I think that decisions based on a thorough analysis of all the information are

sounder than those based on intuition.

42 I tend to be a perfectionist.

43 In discussions I usually produce lots of spontaneous ideas.

44 In meetings I put forward practical realistic ideas.

45 More often than not, rules are there to be broken.

46 I prefer to stand back from a situation and consider all the perspectives.

47 I can often see inconsistencies and weaknesses in other people's arguments.

48 On balance I talk more than I listen.

49 I can often see better, more practical ways to get things done.

50 I think written reports should be short and to the point.

51 I believe that rational, logical thinking should win the day.

52 I tend to discuss specific things with people rather than engaging in social

discussion.

53 I like people who approach things realistically rather than theoretically.

54 In discussions I get impatient with irrelevancies and digressions.

55 If I have a report to write I tend to produce lots of drafts before settling on the final

version.

56 I am keen to try things out to see if they work in practice.

3

57 I am keen to reach answers via a logical approach.

58 I enjoy being the one that talks a lot.

59 In discussions I often find I am the realist, keeping people to the point and

avoiding wild speculations.

60 I like to ponder many alternatives before making up my mind.

61 In discussions with people I often find I am the most dispassionate and objective.

62 In discussions I'm more likely to adopt a 'low profile' than to take the lead and do

most of the talking.

63 I like to be able to relate current actions to a longer term picture.

64 When things go wrong I am happy to shrug it off and 'put it down to experience'.

65 I tend to reject wild, spontaneous ideas as being impractical.

66 It's best to think carefully before taking action.

67 On balance I do the listening rather than the talking.

68 I tend to be tough on people who find it difficult to adopt a logical approach.

69 Most times I believe the end justifies the means.

70 I don't mind hurting people's feelings so long as the job gets done.

71 I find the formality of having specific objectives and plans stifling.

72 I'm usually one of the people who puts life into a party.

73 I do whatever is expedient to get the job done.

74 I quickly get bored with methodical, detailed work.

75 I am keen on exploring the basic assumptions, principles and theories

underpinning things and events.

76 I'm always interested to find out what people think.

77 I like meetings to be run on methodical lines, sticking to laid down agenda, etc.

78 I steer clear of subjective or ambiguous topics.

79 I enjoy the drama and excitement of a crisis situation.

4

80 People often find me insensitive to their feelings.

Scoring and Interpreting the LSQ

The LSQ is scored by awarding one point for each item ticked. There are no points

for crossed items. Simply indicate on the lists below which items were ticked.

2 7 1 5

4 13 3 9

6 15 8 11

10 16 12 19

17 25 14 21

23 28 18 27

24 29 20 35

32 31 22 37

34 33 26 44

38 36 30 49

40 39 42 50

43 41 47 53

45 46 51 54

48 52 57 56

58 55 61 59

64 60 63 65

71 62 68 69

72 66 75 70

74 67 77 73

79 76 78 80

______________________________________

Totals ______________________________________

Activist Reflector Theorist Pragmatist

5

Activists

Activists involve themselves fully and without bias in new experiences. They enjoy

the here and now and are happy to be dominated by immediate experiences. They

are open-minded, not sceptical, and this tends to make them enthusiastic about

anything new. Their philosophy is 'I'll try anything once'. They dash in where angels

fear to tread. They tend to throw caution to the wind. Their days are filled with

activity. They revel in short term crisis fire fighting. They tackle problems by

brainstorming. As soon as the excitement from one activity has died down they are

busy looking for the next. They tend to thrive on the challenge of new experiences

but are bored with implementation and longer term consolidation. They are

gregarious people constantly involving themselves with others but, in doing so, they

hog the limelight. They are the life and soul of the party and seek to centre all

activities around themselves.

Reflectors

Reflectors like to stand back to ponder experiences and observe them from many

different perspectives. They collect data, both first hand and from others, and prefer

to chew it over thoroughly before coming to any conclusion. The thorough collection

and analysis of data about experiences and events is what counts so they tend to

postpone reaching definitive conclusions for as long as possible. Their philosophy is

to be cautious, to leave no stone unturned. 'Look before you leap'; 'Sleep on it'. They

are thoughtful people who like to consider all possible angles and implications before

making a move. They prefer to take a back seat in meetings and discussions. They

enjoy observing other people in action. They listen to others and get the drift of the

discussion before making their own points. They tend to adopt a low profile and have

a slightly distant, tolerant, unruffled air about them. When they act it is part of a wide

picture which includes the past as well as the present and others' observations as

well as their own.

Theorists

Theorists adapt and integrate observations into complex but logically sound theories.

They think problems through in a vertical, step-by-step logical way. They assimilate

disparate facts into coherent theories. They like to analyse and synthesise. They are

keen on basic assumptions, principles, theories, models and systems thinking. Their

philosophy prizes rationality and logic. 'If it's logical it's good'. Questions they

frequently ask are, "Does it make sense?" "How does this fit with that?" "What are the

basic assumptions?" They tend to be detached, analytical and dedicated to rational

objectivity rather than anything subjective or ambiguous. Their approach to problems

is consistently logical. This is their 'mental set' and they rigidly reject anything that

doesn't fit with it. They prefer to maximise certainty and feel uncomfortable with

subjective judgements, lateral thinking and anything flippant.

6

Pragmatists

Pragmatists are keen to try out ideas, theories and techniques to see if they work in

practice. They positively search out new ideas and take the first opportunity to

experiment with applications. They are the sort of people who return from courses

brimming with new ideas that they want to try out in practice. They like to get on with

things and act quickly and confidently on ideas that attract them. They don't like

'beating about the bush' and tend to be impatient with ruminating and open-ended

discussions. They are essentially practical, down to earth people who like making

practical decisions and solving problems. They respond to problems and

opportunities 'as a challenge'. Their philosophy is 'There is always a better way' and

'If it works it's good'

REFERENCE

Honey, P., Mumford, A. (2006) Learning Styles Questionnaire: 80 Item Version. Peter Honey

Publications: London

7


本文发布于:2024-09-21 02:43:33,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.17tex.com/fanyi/22047.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
Copyright ©2019-2024 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 易纺专利技术学习网 豫ICP备2022007602号 豫公网安备41160202000603 站长QQ:729038198 关于我们 投诉建议