劳氏船级社压载水管理指南

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

Ballast Water Management

1 Introduction

2 Descriptive notes

3 Assessment criteria

4 Information to be submitted

■ Section 1: Introduction

Shipping transfers approximately 3 to 5 billion tonnes of ballast water internationally each year and it is estimated that at

least 7,000 different species of aquatic organisms are being carried in ships’ ballast tanks around the world each day.

Ballast water is essential to control trim, list, draught, stability, or stresses of a ship, ballast water and may contain

aquatic organisms or pathogens. These organisms and pathogens s which on discharge in a port or terminal have the

potential to survive and become established and in doing so may pose a threat to indigenous animal and plant life, the

marine environment or humans.

Although other vectors have been identified as being responsible for transferring organisms between geographically

separated water bodies, ballast water discharge from ships is one of the most prominent.

In order to avoid the transfer of unwanted aquatic organisms or pathogens in ballast water ships are required to

undertake ballast water management. Ballast Water Management is defined as means, mechanical, physical, chemical,

or biological processes, either singularly or in combination, to remove, render harmless, or avoids the uptake or

discharge of Harmful Aquatic Organisms and Pathogens within Ballast Water and Sediments. In order to manage ballast

a ship is required to either carry out ballast water exchange at sea or treat the ballast water to defined standards.

1.1 Objective

The Ballast Water Management ShipRight procedure provides a means to indicate to port state, charterers and

insurers and other interested parties that a ship has in place ballast water management procedures that have been

assessed to a recognised standard that not only complies with the standards in the International Convention for the

Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments (the BWM Convention) and the applicable associated

guidelines but also that the procedures have been assessed for design and safety considerations.

In addition the procedure provides a means for complying with the various national and regional ballast water

regulations.

1.2 Application

This procedure sets down the criteria for assignment of the optional ShipRight descriptive note BWMP. The requirements

are additional to other relevant requirements of Lloyd’s Registers Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships

including the Common Structural Rules.

Compliance with any additional requirements that may be imposed by the Administration with whom the ship is

registered and/or by the regional, national or local regulations within whose territorial jurisdiction it is intended to operate

the ship are the responsibility of the Owner.

1.3 Ballast Water Exchange Methods

The ballast water management method or methods selected for a particular ship is the Owner’s responsibility. The

method selected must be one or a combination of the three IMO recognised ballast water exchange methods, i.e.

sequential, flow through or dilution method.

All methods of ballast water exchange and treatment have advantages and disadvantages, and associated safety issues.

When deciding on a particular method or combination of methods of ballast water exchange for a particular ship the

safety issues associated with the method selected for the ship or tank and those associated with the ship are to be taken

into account.

Lloyd’s Register 1

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

For new ships, as far as is practicable the design is to be such that ballast water exchange is facilitated and that the

safety issues associated with the exchange method or methods to be use are minimised.

For existing ships account is to be taken of any modifications that may be required or considered necessary in order to

facilitate ballast water exchange and the safety issues associated with the exchange method or methods to be used

minimised.

Any installed or modifications to structural and piping arrangements may require approval for compliance with the

applicable Rules and Regulations.

Lloyd’s Register 2

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

■ Section 2: Descriptive notes

2.1 BWMP descriptive notes

Ships complying with this Procedure will be eligible to be assigned the BWMP descriptive note together with one, or a

combination of the following associated supplementary characters dependant upon the method or methods of ballast

water management used onboard provided that the applicable criteria in Section 3 are complied with.

The eligible ballast water management methods are as follows:

Sequential method (S)

a process by which a ballast tank intended for the carriage of ballast water is first emptied and then refilled

with replacement ballast water to achieve at least a 95 per cent volumetric exchange.

Flow-through method (F)

a process by which replacement ballast water is pumped into a ballast tank intended for the carriage of ballast

water, allowing water to flow through, overflow or other arrangements.

Dilution method (D)

a process by which replacement ballast water is filled through the top of the ballast tank intended for the

carriage of ballast water with simultaneous discharge from the bottom at the same flow rate and maintaining a

constant level in the tank throughout the ballast exchange operation.

Treatment method (T)

a ballast water treatment system approved in accordance with regulation D-3 of the BWM Convention.

Example:

ShipRight BWMP (S) indicates that the ship uses the sequential method.

ShipRight BWMP (S+F) indicates that the ship uses the sequential and the flow-through methods combined.

Lloyd’s Register is to be advised of any modifications to the ballast water system or the ballast water management plan

that that does or may effect compliance with these procedures and that may affect the assignment of the ShipRight

BWMP descriptive note.

Lloyd’s Register 3

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

■ Section 3: Acceptance criteria

3.1 General Requirements

It is a prerequisite of this procedure that the ship has a Ballast Water Management Plan that has been developed in

accordance with and found to comply with the requirements of regulation B-1 of the Convention and the International

Maritime Organisations (IMO) - Guidelines for Ballast Water Management and Development of Ballast Water

Management Plans MEPC.127 (53). In addition for ships using ballast water exchange the IMO Guidelines for Ballast

Water Exchange MEPC.124(53) are to be taken into account when developing the plan.

The Lloyd’s Register Model Ballast Water Management Plan can be used for the preparation of the plan. At the specific

request of the Owner, or the Shipbuilder a ballast water management plan can be prepared by Lloyd’s Register.

Where a new Ballast Exchange sequence is to be introduced in an existing ballast water management plan, the new

sequence must be submitted to Lloyd’s Register for review and approval, as necessary.

The ballast water management plan is to contain one or more ballast water exchange sequences in a format similar to

the example in Appendix 1. The ballast water exchange sequences are to indicate for each sequence, at the start of the

sequence, at the end of the sequence and at intermediate stages of each sequence including the worst case for each of

the following:

• Longitudinal strength. Checks against the assigned permissible still water bending moments and shear forces,

see 3.2.

• For bulk carriers, the longitudinal strength assessment for hold flooded conditions need not be carried out during

the exchange sequences.

• Intact stability, where required checks against the required values as indicated in the stability booklet. The effects

of the combined free surface moments are to be considered, see 3.2.

• Ballast inertia. For new construction, ballast inertia aspects of bulk carriers are to be considered according to the

ShipRight Structural Design Assessment Procedure when applicable. For bulk carriers in service, ballast inertia

aspects are to be considered using maximum lifetime accelerations and assuming a 100% filling level of the

ballast hold with adjacent topside and/or hopper tanks empty, as submitted in the BEP, or the acceptable sea state

is to be defined.

• Sloshing Where deemed necessary by Lloyd’s Register or at the owners request, sloshing aspects are to be

considered according to the Rules for Ships and the ShipRight Structural Design Assessment Procedure Sloshing

Loads and Scantling Assessment.

• Minimum draught forward checks against the minimum draft forward as indicated in the ship’s plans and/or

loading manual. Where not otherwise defined, this is to be taken as 0,045L or as the draught forward of an

approved condition.

• Propeller immersion. Checks that at all stages of any exchange sequence the top dead centre of the propeller

will remain below the still waterline.

When the propeller immersion criterion can not be satisfied during an entire ballast sequence a note is to be included in

the ballast water management plan in the section dealing with ‘Operational or Safety Restrictions’ as follows “the

Master is advised that the propeller will not be fully immersed during some stages of ballast water exchange”. In addition

in the appropriate sequence in the Ballast Exchange Sequences a similar note is also to be made against the ballast

exchange sequence(s) where full propeller immersion is can not be achieved.

Bridge visibility forward. Checks that bridge visibility is maintained in accordance with SOLAS V/22.

It is recognised that not all ships in service comply with SOLAS 1974, Chapter V Safety of Navigation Regulation 22

Navigation bridge visibility.

Lloyd’s Register 4

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

Where bridge visibility can not be maintained at all stages of an exchange sequence a note inserted in the ballast water

management plan in section dealing with ‘Operational or Safety Restrictions’ that the Master is advised that where the

bridge visibility criterion in SOLAS V/22 can not be complied with during some or all stages of the exchange sequences

the Master is to take due account of the guidance given in section 5.5 to 5.8 of IMO resolution MEPC.124(53) and in

addition with effect from1 January 2010 to comply the revised SOLAS V/22 as adopted by the IMO in resolution

MSC.202(81).

3.2 Assessment of Longitudinal Strength, bending moments and shear forces and intact stability

At all times during ballast water exchange the shear forces and bending moments and intact stability criteria are to be

within the limits stated in the approved loading manual and/stability booklet.

It is not a condition of assignment of the BWMP notation that all ships undertaking ballast water exchange have onboard

a loading instrument approved for Longitudinal Strength, bending moments and shear forces and intact stability however

it is preferable.

For a loading instrument to be accepted as approved it is to meet the following criteria:

The ship has the class notation LI or the descriptive note LI or where the entry “Loading Instrument (C)” or “Loading

Instrument” appears in the Hull Memoranda. A loading instrument approved for the calculation of Longitudinal Strength,

bending moments and shear forces may also be accepted.

If the ship has a stability and/or longitudinal strength calculation program or module has not been accepted or certified by

Lloyd’s Register there is an option to have the stability and/or longitudinal strength calculation program or module

certified in accordance with standards acceptable to Lloyd’s Register.

Flow Through Method. Strength and Stability Approval is not normally required when the flow through method is the

only method used. However when for example a peak or other tank that is normally partially filled is required to be

pumped up for exchange purposes using the flow through method and then discharged to the normal partially filled level

on completion approval of longitudinal Strength, bending moments and shear forces and intact stability maybe required.

Dilution Method. Strength and Stability Approval is not normally required when the dilution method is the only method

used.

Flow through and Dilution Methods Combination. Strength and Stability Approval is not normally required, except

where for example a peak or other tank that is normally partially filled is required to be pumped up for exchange purposes

and then discharged to the normal partially filled level on completion.

Sequential Method. When the sequential method is used, or is used in combination with flow through or dilution

method, approval of longitudinal strength, bending moments and shear forces and intact stability for each ballast water

exchange sequence will be required. Where a ship has a loading instrument approved for strength and stability Lloyd’s

Register may accept the results from a loading instrument approved for longitudinal strength, bending moments and

shear forces and intact stability in lieu of the above. Where the loading instrument is approved for longitudinal strength,

bending moments and shear forces only, Lloyd’s Register may accept the results from a loading instrument for these

aspects however approval of intact stability for each exchange sequence will be required.

3.3 Assessment criteria for each method

In addition to the general requirements in 3.1 and 3.2 the following criteria will be assessed for assignment of the relevant

ShipRight descriptive note. Refer to Section 4 for details of the plans and information to be submitted.

3.3.1 ShipRight BWMP (T)

For the assignment of the ShipRight BWMP(T) descriptive note the criteria given in this section are to be satisfied.

The installed ballast water treatment system is to be approved in accordance with the IMO Guidelines for Approval of

Ballast Water Management Systems MEPC.125(53) as may be amended or;

The installed ballast water treatment system is a prototype treatment system installed and under a programme approved

by the Administration in accordance with regulation D- 4 of the Convention and has been or is undergoing approval in

Lloyd’s Register 5

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

accordance with in accordance with the IMO Guidelines for Approval and Oversight of Prototype Ballast Water Treatment

Technology Programmes MEPC.140(54).

3.3.2 ShipRight BWMP (F)

For the assignment of the ShipRight BWMP (F) descriptive note the criteria given in this section are to be satisfied.

New construction:

The scantlings of the tank boundary structure are to be determined using a tank head equivalent to the full distance to the

top of the tank excluding hatches, but not less than the distance to the deck at the side on which the overflow pipe is

fitted.

Where the overflow discharge pipe is fitted below the freeboard deck, the head is to be taken not less than the full

distance to top of the discharge pipe or the distance to the ship operating draft, whichever is greater.

For applicable formulations, see Pt 4, Ch 1 and Table1.9.1 of the Rules for Ships, for deep tank and watertight bulkheads

in general. For double hull oil tankers, Pt 4, Ch 9, Table 9.6.1 for inner hull and longitudinal oil tight bulkheads remains

applicable. For oil tankers and bulk carriers where the Common Structural Rules (CSR) are applicable CSR Oil Tankers

Section 8 paragraph 2.5 or CSR Bulk Carriers Chapter 6 Sections 1 and 2 apply.

Ships in service:

The flow-through method is not to be utilised, unless the tank boundary structure has been confirmed as being

acceptable using a tank head as defined for new construction above, and any structural modifications found necessary

have been carried out. For applicable formulation, see Pt 4, Ch 1, Table 1.9.1 of the Rules for Ships for deep tank

bulkheads in general. For double hull oil tankers, Pt 4, Ch 9, Table 9.6.1 for inner hull and longitudinal oil tight bulkheads

remains applicable. For oil tankers and bulk carriers where the Common Structural Rules (CSR) are applicable CSR Oil

Tankers Section 8 paragraph 2.5 or CSR Bulk Carriers Chapter 6 Sections 1 and 2 apply.

It is not permitted to connect ballast tanks, which were not previously connected, unless the tank boundary structure is

checked and found satisfactory or any necessary structural modifications are carried out.

All cases:

The flow-through method will only be accepted for partially filled peak tanks, provided that inadvertent exceedance of the

design partial filling levels will not result in hull girder bending moments and shear forces or stability criteria exceeding the

permissible values.

At the specific request of the Owner, Lloyd’s Register can calculate the pressure drop of the pipework and match it to the

ballast pump capacity curve.

The following recommendations are to be complied with as far is reasonable and practicable:

Inlet and outlet piping connections to be located as far apart as practicable, in order to improve circulation.

A larger discharge pipe located in a remote position opposite from the filling pipe and a smaller discharge pipe is to be

located in a position closer to the filling pipe, to improve circulation.

The total sectional area of the ballast water discharge pipes is to be arranged to be not less than two times the sectional

area of the filling pipe, in order to mitigate the risk of overpressure.

The use of two ballast pumps simultaneously is not recommended due to the risk of overpressure, unless the system is

designed for the simultaneous use of two pumps.

Distribute one ballast pump to several tanks, in order to mitigate the risk of overpressure.

Where overflow pipes are fitted to hatch coamings, it is recommended that they are fitted to the side coaming with a

closing plate hinge arrangement and to be arranged to discharge downward.

Manholes on upper deck may be used as overflow discharge, provided that a blank flange with a seat can fitted to the

manhole cover arranged so that a portable overflow pipe with 90° elbow can be connected during the flow-through

operation to direct the water away from the deck.

Lloyd’s Register 6

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

Ballast water is not to be discharged from an air pipe head with float type closing appliance, unless a blank flange with a

short distance piece is fitted below the air pipe head, which is to be removed during the flow-though operation.

3.3.3 ShipRight BWMP (S)

For the assignment of the ShipRight BWMP (S) descriptive note, the criteria given in this section are to be satisfied.

The following are to be complied with:

Ballast holds and large ballast tanks are to be equipped with pressure/vacuum valves or other means acceptable to

Lloyd’s Register, in order to mitigate the risk of a large drop in pressure, due to the rapid change in the contents of the

tank during ballast discharge by gravity. Pressure/vacuum valves valves, where fitted, are to be maintained in good

working order, as a faulty pressure/vacuum valve for example by being blocked or failing to lift may result in hatch cover

damage.

During the intermediate stages of ballast water exchange, the machinery’s operating design characteristics (angles of

inclination) are not to be exceeded.

In addition the following recommendations are to be complied with as far is reasonable and practicable:

If two ballast pumps are used for filling purposes the ballast water management plan is to contain a note that, when the fill

level reaches 80–90 per cent, one of the pumps is to be stopped, in order to mitigate the risk of over-pressurisation.

Where operational limits are specified, at least two independent pumps are to be fitted. The pumps are to be arranged

such that, if one pump fails, then the stand-by pump is immediately available for operation.

Sequences with partial fill level are to be avoided. Where at the end of a sequence a tank remains partially filled,

conditions at ±10 per cent of the partial fill level are also to be assessed, since it is practically difficult to match the

specified partial fill level whilst ship motions are experienced.

Exchange sequences are to be developed such that the still water bending moments and shear forces do not exceed

85% of the permissible values, in order to account for small deviations in service.

3.3.4 ShipRight BWMP (D)

For the assignment of the ShipRight BWMP (D) descriptive note the criteria given in this section are to be satisfied.

Where the dilution method of exchange is used adequate provisions are to be made for appropriate pumping and piping

arrangements to facilitate simultaneous loading and unloading of ballast water at the same flow rate.

Arrangements are to be made to continually monitoring of the ballast water level in the tanks to ensure a constant level is

maintained to avoid the possibility of overfilling the tank or reducing the level in the tank.

Lloyd’s Register 7

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

■ Section 4: Information to be submitted

4.1 General

The following plans and information are to be submitted in all cases:

(a) A copy of an approved ballast water management plan meeting the requirements in Section 3.1; or

(b) a plan to be approved by Lloyd’s Register to meet the requirements of 3.1, a minimum of two copies are to be

submitted Lloyd’s Register will retain one copy of the ballast water management plan.

(c) Ballast pumping and piping arrangements.

(d) Air and sounding pipes arrangements.

(e) Specifications and capacity curves for ballast pump and general service pump, if used for ballast transfer.

(f) General arrangement and capacity plan.

(g) Ballast tank and pump capacities and estimated emptying and refilling times.

(h) A copy of the approval certificate for the loading instrument.

(j) A copy of the ships approved loading manual.

4.2 Specific requirements for the ballast water management options defined in Section 3

In addition to the plans and information in 4.1:

(a) For the assignment of ShipRight BWMP (T):

A certificate confirming the system has been approved in accordance with in accordance with the IMO Guidelines

for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems MEPC.125(53) as may be amended issued by a flag

administration signatory to the Convention or by Lloyd’s Register or by a member of the International Association

of Classification Societies issuing the approval certificate on behalf of a flag administration signatory to the

Convention.

Approved plans or diagrams of the treatment system installation, and arrangements including piping systems,

connections to the ballast system, treated ballast water outlet points and sampling point(s).

(b) For the assignment of ShipRight BWMP (F):

For bulk carriers confirmation that that the topside and hopper tanks are or are not interconnected.

(c) For the assignment of ShipRight BWMP (S):

For ships in service, for the assessment of ballast inertia: approved midship section with end connection details,

ballast hold volume data or curves, metacentric height, service speed and block coefficient.

4.3 Optional Assessment Criteria

Where Lloyd’s Register, at the specific request of the Owner, is to certify the stability and/or longitudinal strength

calculation program or module, the information required by Lloyd’s Register’s document entitled Approval of Longitudinal

Strength and Stability Calculation Programs is to be submitted.

Where Lloyd’s Register, at the specific request of the Owner, is to calculate the pressure drop of the pipework and match

it to the ballast pump capacity curve, the following information is to be submitted:

Ballast supply piping dimensions.

Overflow pipe length and size.

Piping components fitted to the ballast supply line, i.e. bends, T-connections, type and number of valves.

Lloyd’s Register 8

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

Pump capacity curve.

Air vent head flow capacity curve.

4.4 Modifications

Plans and particulars of proposed modifications to the ballast system or other modification to the ship which may affect

the BWMP descriptive note assigned to the ship are to be submitted for approval before any work commences and the

work is to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans to the Surveyor’s satisfaction.

Lloyd’s Register 9

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

Appendix 1 Example Ballast Exchange Sequence Table

Voyage:

From:

To:

Expected weather:

Allowable limits

Min

fwd

draft

Stab’

Criteria

Max

allowable SW

BM

%

MAX

allow

SW SF

Prop

fully

immers

at

M

M %

Actual Values

Fo/Do/Lo/Fw

Mt

Tank

No

Tank

No

Tank

No

Tank

No

F.P.T

Draft

Aft M

Trim M

Draft

Fwd

Stab’

Criteria

SW BM

%

SW SF

%

Prop.

Immer

%.

InvisLength M

Est’ed

Time

Hours

Remarks

Sequence

AP

Tank

No

Tank

No

Tank

No

Initial Condition

Step 1:

Step 2:

Step 3:

Step 4:

Total Time Hours

Lloyd’s Register 10

Ballast Water Management 2009/01

The colouring of the cells where the criteria are not satisfied can enhance understanding

Abbreviations

ES - Empty at start

FS - Full at start

FL - Filling

D - Discharging

FE - Full at end

EE - Empty at end

X% - Percentage full

Percentage of tank level or symbols such as those presented below may be used as

necessary where greater detail is required , additional symbols can be defined

Notes

Examples

Note 1: The master is advised that the propeller will not be fully immersed during this step/sequence

Note 2: The master is advised that bridge visibility forward will be reduced during this step/sequence

Note 3 The master is advised to verify that tanks shown as "e" or "e" are totally empty and tanks shown as "f" or "f" are totally full, at the

start and end of the step/sequence

Note 4: Where two ballast pumps are used for filling purposes, when the full level reaches 80% - 90%, then one of the pumps is

Note 5: The indicative times for ballast exchange by flow-through method of …tanks(s) id…are provided separately

For conservative reasons, where at the end of a step / sequence a tank remains partially filled, additional conditions at ± 10 % of the partial fill

level are also be assessed, since it is practically difficult to match the specified partial fill level whilst ship motions are experienced

Aim to develop sequences where the still water bending moments and shear forces do not exceed 85% of the permissible values, in order to

account for small deviations in service, so that the master and the appointed ballast water

Lloyd’s Register 11